Marcie of Buried in Print and I have spent the first few months or so of 2024 rereading Carol Shields’s short stories: one volume per month from the Collected Stories. (Previous reviews: Various Miracles (1985) and The Orange Fish (1989).) Dressing Up for the Carnival was a late collection, published in 2000 – just a few years before the author’s death. Like Various Miracles, it’s a long book; in fact, at 22 stories, it’s the longest of the three. And, just like the other two, it opens with the title story, which is itself akin to “Various Miracles” with its pile-up of seemingly random happenings. All the examples are of how the things that people wear, or carry, create a persona. I noted pleasing symmetry in that “Dressing Up for the Carnival” opens the book, while the final story is “Dressing Down,” about a married couple divided by the husband’s devotion to naturism for one month out of each year.
I hadn’t realized that Unless, Shields’s final, Booker-shortlisted novel, arose from one of these stories: “A Scarf.” It took me just two paragraphs to figure it out, based on her narrator’s punning novel title (My Thyme Is Up). I’d also forgotten about the fun Shields pokes at literary snobbishness through her protagonist winning the Offenden Prize, which “recognizes literary quality and honors accessibility”. (There is actually a UK prize that rewards ease of reading, the Goldsboro Books Glass Bell Award.)
Many main characters throughout Shields’s work are artists, musicians, writers or poets. When windows are subject to an exorbitant tax, two painters decide to create their own, a joint project that brings the couple closer (in “Windows”). The elevated diction and proliferating French phrases skewer the narrator’s pretensions. Edging towards surrealism is another custom of Shields’s, seen here in “Weather,” where meteorological phenomena – or the lack thereof – are literal and a metaphor for marriage. This one finds an echo in “Stop!”, a fable about a queen who avoids all risk and change and thus disallows weather.
A number of the flash-length stories are similarly allegorical, or linguistic experiments, e.g., “Absence,” which is lipogrammatic (no “I”). “Flatties: their Various Forms and Uses” is a faux-anthropological one about flatbreads that reminded me of “Today Is the Day.” “The Harp” looks at the aftermath of the freak accident of a harp falling from the sky. “Keys” is a daisy-chain type of story (like “Home” et al.), with the keys symbolic of access, ownership, secrets, home, and more. Academia is another frequent subject for Shields. “Ilk” has the same academic jargon (“narrativity is ovarian, not ejaculatory”) and mockery of a predominantly male preserve as in “The Metaphor Is Dead–Pass It On” and “Salt.”
A topic shared with The Orange Fish is the biographer’s art. I loved “Edith-Esther,” about a biographer who becomes so obsessed with the expression of spirituality in his subject’s works that he completely skews her life story towards it, even though she tells him flat out she doesn’t believe in God. What a nightmare for an author to be so misunderstood; it’s no accident, of course, that it’s a male critic doing it to a female writer. “Invention” imagines creation scenarios for everything from steering wheel covers to daydreaming.
In “Dying for Love,” an early standout for me, three wronged women consider suicide. The vocabulary quickly alerts the reader to a change of time period after each section break. All three decide “Life is a thing to be cherished”. My three favourites, though, were the final three – all slightly cheeky with the focus on sex (and naturism). They were together an excellent way to close the volume, and the Collected Stories. In “The Next Best Kiss,” single mother Sandy meets a new paramour at a conference. She and Todd share garrulousness, and a sexual connection. But he doesn’t’ see the appeal of her biography’s subject, a Gregor Mendel-meets-John Clare type, and she is aghast to learn that he still lives with his mother.
“Eros,” set at a sexually charged dinner party (and you know from Larry’s Party that Shields is brilliant at party scenes), spools back through Ann’s erotic life, all the way to childhood ignorance and curiosity. “Everyone knew this awful secret which was everywhere suggested but which for Ann lay, still, a quarter-inch out of reach.” That Ann has lost a breast to cancer treatment made me ponder whether this story reflected Shields’s own experience – she died in 2003 of a recurrence of breast cancer.
There were a few too many second-tier stories here compared to The Orange Fish, but several gems; and I always appreciate Shields’s wordplay and insider’s satire on being an academic and/or a writer.
My original rating (c. 2008): ![]()
My rating now: ![]()
Bonus
Shields’s final short story, “Segue,” is printed first in the Collected Stories. Dutiful Marcie read it first, whereas I saved it for last to try to preserve a sense of chronological order. Max Sexton writes novels, the latest of which sounds exactly like The Corrections – a 2001 publication, and Shields also references 9/11. Jane Sexton, the narrator, writes sonnets (“little sounds”) and thinks about ageing, routine, and the transmutation of life into art. A sonnet typically involves a “turn,” which I suppose is the origin of the title. Coming to the end of her life, did Shields think of herself primarily as a poet? This line did strike me as autobiographical: “Forget you are a sixty-seven-year-old woman with a girlish white pageboy.” The Oak Park, Illinois setting inevitably reminded me of Hemingway, but Shields, too, was from Chicago. The final line captures the bittersweet nature of so much of her work: “if it weren’t for my particular circumstances I would be happy.”
Rereading Shields is a habit I plan to keep up. For my next reread, I fancy Mary Swann.
It’s such a long time since I read any Carol Shields. I actually own Dressing Up for the Carnival. So there’s no excuse is there? Apart from the dreaded TBR. Eight books I reserved at the library have come in at the same time … Bad planning on my part – and the books’ as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They do seem to all come at once, don’t they? Perhaps this short story collection is one you can have on the pile and dip into one story at a time in between other reads?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like a plan!
LikeLike
I’ve never read any of Shields’ short stories but I imagine her writing really suits the form – great set pieces.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s true. She does a lot more experimenting with style and tone as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As usual, you’ve done a terrific job of summarising this collection and placing it in context of her body of short story writing. I also really enjoyed your summary post about rereading her earlier novels (I had been trying to recall why we undertook that, at that point in time, but I guess it was because of wanting to reread for the prize of prizes for the Women’s Fiction Prizelist winners’ year?). I loved the first two collections so much when they were new-ish and I never read Dressing up for the Carnival properly (but her stories were so often available in other formats back then, as singles in magazines, that I considered that collection a reread too). Now when I think about it, I guess I didn’t want to read that collection back then because I feared it might be her last collection. In our rereading, if we had waited 11 years to move from rereading the second collection to the third, I think I would have enjoyed Dressing up for the Carnival even more. But the echoes we discovered in it, hearkening back to earlier stories, which had been such recent rediscoveries and delights, perhaps made the experience of the final and longest collection less remarkable somehow. So while I wouldn’t say second-tier, I think we felt a similar sense with finishing. Segue, I thought fabulous. I wished that I had saved it after all! Which others are contenders for your next reread, or are you already set on Swann? A real favourite of mine, no arm-twisting required.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I can’t remember how we decided to embark on that year of rereading, but it was a good way to be kept busy during 2020 🙂 Thank you for inviting me along on this short story rereading project; it’s been rewarding — and it’s good to make myself read short fiction in a month that isn’t September! Do you have a next story project in mind?
I treated myself to Swann a little while back, secondhand, so maybe we can pick that up when prize season has died down a little?
LikeLike
Swann, Republic of Love, Stone Diaries and Unless remain (as we plucked Larry out of the middle). It really does make sense to continue in order-ish. I think of Swann as being rather a wintry story, but I don’t know if that’s part of the novel or part of my reading memories? (It’s possibly my favourite, but then whatever one I’ve read lately is also my favourite. heheh)
Mel at The Reading Life convinced me (easily) to buy Jean Stafford and Nancy Hale collections (Stafford the Collected and Hale’s Where the Light Falls) which will dapple through the rest of 2024. But maybe too early for your liking?
LikeLike
I’ve already reread The Republic of Love and The Stone Diaries, I guess that was on my own. Unless I feel I’ve read too recently to reread (4.5 years ago).
I’ve never heard of Hale. No library holdings for her or Stafford hereabouts (though the University of Reading’s Special Collections appears to have Stafford’s papers).
I expect I’ll do my usual smattering of stories through until September’s flood. I’m currently reading Barcelona by Mary Costello and This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things by Naomi Wood.
LikeLike
[…] year, Rebecca @ Bookish Beck and Mel at The Reading Life and I have been reading Carol Shields Collected Stories (2004). Rebecca […]
LikeLike